This week
in our local paper “THE
Submitted
by Jon Howe,
An unmasked
crowd of people, some wearing T-shirts that said “unvaxed,” defiantly walked
around in our local grocery store the other day, to protest our current mask
mandate.
It is law
enforcement’s duty to enforce compliance with current masking requirements.
Similarly,
it is law enforcement’s duty to stop and arrest a drunk driver.
What is the
parallel?
If someone
does not wear a mask at home or within their circle of friends and family,
fine. They are entitled to their personal and private choice. Asking them to
wear a mask in public does not infringe on that freedom at all. They have a
right to not wear a mask and to drink alcohol in the privacy of their own home. BUT when
someone gets drunk and then goes for a drive, can we all agree that their
choice is no longer personal and private but public? As a drunk driver
endangers the public, so also a potentially infected person who refuses to wear
a mask in public endangers the public.
There are
countless parallels. If you want to be naked at home, fine. But are you free to
go naked at the grocery store? Does the expectation that you will wear clothes
(like wearing a mask) in public infringe on your rights? (Not that nudity
endangers anyone.)
Asking
people to wear a mask does not infringe on rights. It’s not a big deal, nor a
political issue, nor should it be. It’s a simple precaution, a health
issue…based on the available science. Is science perfect? No. But it’s the best
tool we have. Better than fear and suspicion. To the best of our knowledge,
there is a virus and it is spreading. Through the air, we
are told, from an infected person’s breath and some infected people show no
symptoms.
Sadly and
understandably, we have perfected a culture and climate of distrust. Too many
times, governments, corporations and industries have proven themselves to be
dishonest, unethical, greedy and even criminal. It’s a favorite movie theme:
the fierce individualist exposes and subdues the big bad business. So of course
conspiracies thrive. Who can we trust?
What if
there is no virus? What is the worst vaccinated thing that can happen: that the
vaccine kills off most of the human species? Could there be a globally
coordinated plan to profit from the pandemic and depopulate the planet? And
what is the worst unvaccinated thing that can happen if there is a virus: that
the virus is here longer than it has to be and many more of us die than have
to. Which is the more believable scenario? Which is the better risk?
Perhaps the
worst thing that can happen, either way, is that we are pitted against each
other.
If you
don’t wear a mask, nor get a vaccine, fine. Please simply stay away from the
rest of us. And when you can’t do that (i.e. at a grocery store or in a
school), please wear a mask during that brief contact. No big deal.
If you
don’t think covid is real, if you don’t wear a mask or get a vaccine…yet you
get covid, you have every right to deal with it in the privacy of your own home
rather than endangering the doctors and nurses and other patients at the
hospital.
Protesting
is our freedom of speech. Go for it. Exercise your right to it.
But
protesting by potentially endangering other peoples’ lives is not anyone’s
right.
Be well.
Cartoon:
Columbian Missourian 4/21
I hear you. The side effects were annoying, but it's a pale fraction of what those who suffer from covid faced. One of my good friends from my old parish in Seattle is an ECMO nurse, one of the last people someone with covid will see in this world, and the stories he tells are harrowing and heartbreaking. I don't get the people protesting this, especially when there are so many eyewitness stories backing everything up.
ReplyDelete